Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EberhardEberhard
VS
Turner Construction CompanyTurner Construction Company
Eberhard

Eberhard

15220 Raymer Street, Los Angeles, California, 91405, US

Last Update: 23/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://eberhardco.com/
754/1000Fair

Eberhard offers a proud tradition of the finest construction and roofing services available since 1945.

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

375 Hudson Street, New York, 10014, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Turner is a North America-based, international construction services company and is a leading builder in diverse and numerous market segments. The company has earned recognition for undertaking large, complex projects, fostering innovation, embracing emerging technologi...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:18,335
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eberhard

Eberhard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eberhard in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turner Construction Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eberhard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eberhard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Turner Construction Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Construction Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eberhard

Eberhard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUR147072625

FAQ

Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eberhard company and Turner Construction Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eberhard and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eberhard and Turner Construction Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eberhard or Turner Construction Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eberhard or Turner Construction Company ?
Between Eberhard and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eberhard and Turner Construction Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA