Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eat. Live. Do. WellEat. Live. Do. Well
VS
NestléNestlé
Eat. Live. Do. Well

Eat. Live. Do. Well

Charlotte, US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Our purpose is to create meaningful food experiences that promote well-being for people and planet. Our Chefs, Registered Dietitians and Sustainability experts share information and resources that you can use anywhere. Eat.Live.Do.Well is an initiative of Compass Group

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nestlé

Nestlé

Av. Nestlé 55, Vevey, CH, 1800

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nestle.com
843/1000Good

As the world’s largest food and beverage company we are driven by a simple aim: unlocking the power of food to enhance quality of life for everyone, today and for generations to come. To deliver on this, we serve with passion, with a spirit of excellence, offering produ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:214,515
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eat. Live. Do. Well

Eat. Live. Do. Well

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nestlé

Nestlé

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eat. Live. Do. Well in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eat. Live. Do. Well (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eat. Live. Do. Well cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nestlé (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eat. Live. Do. Well

Eat. Live. Do. Well

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nestlé

Nestlé

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well company and Nestlé company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well and Nestlé, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well and Nestlé, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eat. Live. Do. Well or Nestlé ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eat. Live. Do. Well or Nestlé ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well and Nestlé, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eat. Live. Do. Well and Nestlé, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3