Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EAT Club EAT Club
VS
eBayeBay
EAT Club

EAT Club

1400A Seaport Blvd, Redwood City, CA, 94063, US

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eatclub.com
767/1000Fair

EAT Club is a cutting edge food-tech company created to disrupt “one-size fits all” corporate catering through an individualized lunch experience. Our founders, Rodrigo Santibanez and Kevin Yang were inspired by India’s Dabbawala lunch delivery system, which brings ind...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eBay

eBay

2025 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, 95125, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ebayinc.com/
794/1000Fair

At eBay, we create pathways to connect millions of sellers and buyers in more than 190 markets around the world. Our technology empowers our customers, providing everyone the opportunity to grow and thrive — no matter who they are or where they are in the world. And the...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:21,881
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EAT Club

EAT Club

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eBay

eBay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EAT Club in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

eBay has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - EAT Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EAT Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eBay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eBay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EAT Club

EAT Club

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eBay

eBay

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GOOEBA1785781429
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GOOEBA1785824643

FAQ

Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EAT Club company and eBay company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EAT Club and eBay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EAT Club and eBay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EAT Club or eBay ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EAT Club or eBay ?
Between EAT Club and eBay, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EAT Club and eBay, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA