Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EAT Club EAT Club
VS
e&e&
EAT Club

EAT Club

1400A Seaport Blvd, Redwood City, CA, 94063, US

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eatclub.com
767/1000Fair

EAT Club is a cutting edge food-tech company created to disrupt “one-size fits all” corporate catering through an individualized lunch experience. Our founders, Rodrigo Santibanez and Kevin Yang were inspired by India’s Dabbawala lunch delivery system, which brings ind...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
e&

e&

Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://eand.com
800/1000Good

We're a global technology group focused on innovation and collaboration to create a better future for all. Since 1976, we've been pioneering new technologies and expanding our reach to more people and places. Today, we provide services to over 163 million customers acro...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:30,398
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EAT Club

EAT Club

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
e&

e&

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EAT Club in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for e& in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EAT Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EAT Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - e& (X = Date, Y = Severity)

e& cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EAT Club

EAT Club

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
e&

e&

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EAT Club company and e& company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EAT Club and e&, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EAT Club and e&, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EAT Club or e& ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EAT Club or e& ?
Between EAT Club and e&, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EAT Club and e&, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2