Comparison Overview
Easypak

Easypak
24 Jytek Dr, Leominster, 01453, US
Last Update: 15/07/2026
Easypak offers dependable, high-performing plastic packaging in a variety of industries for food, consumer goods, medical and industrial applications. At Easypak, a solutions-based approach, led by a team of industry experts, is used to design and manufacture quality...

Avery Dennison
Mentor, Ohio, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Easypak







Avery Dennison






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Easypak has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.
Incident History - Easypak (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Easypak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Easypak

Avery Dennison
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.