Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EasypakEasypak
VS
Avery DennisonAvery Dennison
Easypak

Easypak

24 Jytek Dr, Leominster, 01453, US

Last Update: 15/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://easypak.com/
661/1000Weak

Easypak offers dependable, high-performing plastic packaging in a variety of industries for food, consumer goods, medical and industrial applications. At Easypak, a solutions-based approach, led by a team of industry experts, is used to design and manufacture quality...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:123
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Mentor, Ohio, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://averydennison.com
776/1000Fair

We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:21,695
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Easypak

Easypak

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Easypak has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Easypak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Easypak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Easypak

Easypak

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
EAS1784140635
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Easypak company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Easypak and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Easypak and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Easypak or Avery Dennison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Easypak or Avery Dennison ?
Between Easypak and Avery Dennison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Easypak and Avery Dennison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9