Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Easy S.A.Easy S.A.
VS
Travis Perkins plcTravis Perkins plc
Easy S.A.

Easy S.A.

Av Kennedy, None, santiago, metropolitana, CL, 83335

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.easy.cl
754/1000Fair

Nos especializamos en productos y materiales para la construcción, remodelación, decoración y jardinería. En nuestras grandes y confortables tiendas, ofrecemos una amplia gama de productos de calidad, que invitan a nuestros clientes a dejar volar la imaginación, para cr...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:2,198
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Ryehill House, Rye Hill Close, Northampton, NN5 7UA, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Travis Perkins plc is the UK’s largest distributor of building materials to trade customers. The breadth, reach and scale of our business means we are in a unique position to provide customers with the building materials and tools they need for their projects, when and ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,742
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Easy S.A.

Easy S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Easy S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travis Perkins plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Easy S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Easy S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Travis Perkins plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travis Perkins plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Easy S.A.

Easy S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Easy S.A. company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Easy S.A. and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Easy S.A. and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Easy S.A. or Travis Perkins plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Easy S.A. or Travis Perkins plc ?
Between Easy S.A. and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Easy S.A. and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA