Comparison Overview
Eastlink
Eastlink
6080 Young St, Halifax, B3K 5M3, CA
Last Update: 29/08/2026
As Canada’s largest family owned and operated telecommunications company, Eastlink provides world-class mobile, TV, video entertainment and communications services to residential, business and public sector customers across Canada. Powered by state-of-the-art fibre and ...
Tata Communications
Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Eastlink
Tata Communications
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Eastlink has 47.09% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.
Incident History - Eastlink (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Eastlink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Eastlink
Tata Communications
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/v0.29.0/vllm/distributed/kv_transfer/kv_connector/v1/nixl/push_worker.py#L162-L181
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/55677
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vllm-through-0.29.0-memory-exhaustion-via-rejected-requests
redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L204-L213
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L291-L306
- https://github.com/redis/ioredis/issues/2108
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/redis-parser-through-3.0.0-denial-of-service-via-unbounded-recursion
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.