Comparison Overview
Easterly Government Properties
Easterly Government Properties
2001 K Street, NW, Washington, 20006, US
Last Update: 16/06/2026
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (NYSE:DEA) is based in Washington, D.C., and focuses primarily on the acquisition, development and management of Class A commercial properties that are leased to the U.S. Government. Easterly’s experienced management team brings spec...
Colliers
1140 Bay St, Suite 4000, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5S 2B4
Last Update: 25/09/2026
Colliers (NASDAQ, TSX: CIGI) is a global diversified professional services and investment management company operating through three industry-leading businesses: Commercial Real Estate, Engineering and Investment Management. With greater than a 30-year track record of c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Easterly Government Properties
Colliers
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
Easterly Government Properties has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Colliers in 2026.
Incident History - Easterly Government Properties (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Easterly Government Properties cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Colliers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Colliers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Easterly Government Properties
Colliers
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.