Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)
VS
AeromexicoAeromexico
EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

N/A

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile

Under the scope of the EASA approval, CDG Engineering HQ in Frimley (EASA.21J.536) is authorized to provide engineering design services for changes and repairs to aircraft for cabin interiors.

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

MX

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial aviation and the promotion of passenger loyalty programs in Mexico. Aeromexico, Mexico’s global airline, operates more than 600 daily flights and has its main hub in Termi...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:14,112
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Aeromexico has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aeromexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeromexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AER1790036934

FAQ

Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) company and Aeromexico company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) and Aeromexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) and Aeromexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) or Aeromexico ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) or Aeromexico ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) and Aeromexico, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EASA Design Organisation Approval (DOA) and Aeromexico, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2