Comparison Overview
e&
e&
Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE
Last Update: 08/09/2026
We're a global technology group focused on innovation and collaboration to create a better future for all. Since 1976, we've been pioneering new technologies and expanding our reach to more people and places. Today, we provide services to over 163 million customers acro...
foodpanda
63 Robinson Road, Singapore, 068894, SG
Last Update: 15/09/2026
At foodpanda, we're on a mission to redefine how food, people, culture and tech are connected. Our panda family consists of problem solvers, designers and thinkers, working around the clock to make foodpanda the most powerful online tool for food convenience in the univ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
e&
foodpanda
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for e& in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for foodpanda in 2026.
Incident History - e& (X = Date, Y = Severity)
e& cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - foodpanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)
foodpanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
e&
foodpanda
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.