Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

E.ON Digital TechnologyE.ON Digital Technology
VS
Accenture in IndiaAccenture in India
E.ON Digital Technology

E.ON Digital Technology

Tresckowstraße 3-5, Hannover, 30457, DE

Last Update: 05/01/2026

View Profile

E.ON Digital Technology is a group-wide business function which manages and implements the digital transformation of E.ON SE, an internationally active private energy company that focuses on energy networks, customer solutions and renewable energies. With around 4500 em...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,849
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

IBC Knowledge Park,, Bengaluru, 560029, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
822/1000Good

Accenture is a global professional services company with leading capabilities in digital, cloud and security. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries, we offer Strategy and Consulting, Interactive, Technology and Operations s...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:77,006
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
E.ON Digital Technology

E.ON Digital Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON Digital Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accenture in India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - E.ON Digital Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON Digital Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Accenture in India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture in India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
E.ON Digital Technology

E.ON Digital Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology company and Accenture in India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology and Accenture in India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology and Accenture in India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - E.ON Digital Technology or Accenture in India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - E.ON Digital Technology or Accenture in India ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology and Accenture in India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between E.ON Digital Technology and Accenture in India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9