Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

eÓticaeÓtica
VS
Primary SchoolPrimary School
eÓtica

eÓtica

Avenida Jaguaré 818, São Paulo, undefined, undefined, BR

Last Update: 16/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eotica.com.br
765/1000Fair

A 1a ótica online do Brasil. Na eÓtica você compra lentes de contato, óculos de sol, óculos de grau, armações e acessórios online. A nossa loja online conta com uma enorme variedade de marcas nacionais e internacionais para seus olhos, as quais estão divididas em quatr...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Primary School

Primary School

2452, AU

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

www.primaryschool.com.au is a directory of sites for students and lesson plans and reference material for teachers and parents. It is currently averaging up to 350,000 unique visitors a month and has over 44,000 subscribers to its free weekly newsletter which showcases ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,874
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
eÓtica

eÓtica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Primary School

Primary School

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eÓtica in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Primary School in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - eÓtica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eÓtica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Primary School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Primary School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
eÓtica

eÓtica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Primary School

Primary School

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between eÓtica company and Primary School company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between eÓtica and Primary School, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between eÓtica and Primary School, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - eÓtica or Primary School ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - eÓtica or Primary School ?
Between eÓtica and Primary School, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between eÓtica and Primary School, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA