Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

eÓticaeÓtica
VS
BinanceBinance
eÓtica

eÓtica

Avenida Jaguaré 818, São Paulo, undefined, undefined, BR

Last Update: 16/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eotica.com.br
765/1000Fair

A 1a ótica online do Brasil. Na eÓtica você compra lentes de contato, óculos de sol, óculos de grau, armações e acessórios online. A nossa loja online conta com uma enorme variedade de marcas nacionais e internacionais para seus olhos, as quais estão divididas em quatr...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Binance

Binance

Everywhere, 0, OO

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.binance.com/
291/1000Critical

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicate...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,567
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
eÓtica

eÓtica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Binance

Binance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eÓtica in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Binance has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - eÓtica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eÓtica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
eÓtica

eÓtica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Binance

Binance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINDIRMER1790037002
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BINMEX1787063171
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIR1786633007

FAQ

Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between eÓtica company and Binance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between eÓtica and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between eÓtica and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - eÓtica or Binance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - eÓtica or Binance ?
Between eÓtica and Binance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between eÓtica and Binance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2