Comparison Overview

E.ON

VS

Centrica

E.ON

Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, undefined, 45131, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09

The E.ON Group is one of Europe's largest operators of energy networks and energy infrastructure and a provider of innovative customer solutions for 50 million customers. Thus, we are decisively driving forward the energy transition in Europe and are committed to sustainability, climate protection, and the future of our planet.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 29,412
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Centrica

Maidenhead Road, Windsor, SL4 5GD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Centrica is an international energy services and solutions company, founded on a 200-year heritage of serving customers in homes and businesses. We supply energy and services to over 10 million customers, mainly in the UK and Ireland, through brands such as British Gas, Bord Gáis Energy and Centrica Business Solutions. Through our trusted brands, we deliver innovative energy and services solutions to help solve customers’ needs, supported by thousands of engineers and technicians. We are committed to energising a greener, fairer future.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 18,398
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
E.ON
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centrica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrica in 2025.

Incident History — E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centrica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-on.jpeg
E.ON
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

E.ON company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centrica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Centrica company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas E.ON company has not reported any.

In the current year, Centrica company and E.ON company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Centrica company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while E.ON company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Centrica company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centrica company nor E.ON company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither E.ON company nor Centrica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centrica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to E.ON company.

E.ON company employs more people globally than Centrica company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither E.ON nor Centrica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X