Comparison Overview
E.ON UK

E.ON UK
Westwood Way, Coventry, undefined, CV4 8LG, GB
Last Update: 21/04/2026
It's on us to make new energy work We’re E.ON UK, leading the energy transition for a more sustainable future. As part of the E.ON group, we’re also one of Europe’s largest operators of energy networks and energy infrastructure and a provider of innovative customer solu...

RWE
RWE Platz 1, Essen, 45141, DE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
RWE is leading the way to a clean energy world. With its investment and growth strategy Growing Green, RWE is contributing significantly to the success of the energy transition and the decarbonisation of the energy system. Around 20,000 employees work for the company in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

E.ON UK







RWE






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for E.ON UK in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RWE in 2026.
Incident History - E.ON UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
E.ON UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - RWE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RWE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

E.ON UK

RWE
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.