Comparison Overview
E-Corp
E-Corp
84041, US
Last Update: 25/10/2025
E-Corp provides general construction contracting services to agencies of the federal government. OUR PHILOSOPHY Excellence in Contracting Exceeding your Expectations Exceptional Performances Exceptional performance on every project is the primary objective ...
STRABAG
Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, 9800, AT
Last Update: 07/10/2026
At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, undergr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
E-Corp
STRABAG
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for E-Corp in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2026.
Incident History - E-Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)
E-Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
E-Corp
STRABAG
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.