Comparison Overview
DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE

DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE
Dražice 69, Benátky nad Jizerou, 45148465, 294 71, CZ
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Mezi činnosti společnosti DZ Dražice patří výroba ohřívačů a zásobníků vody, které prodáváme do téměř čtyřiceti zemí celého světa. Jsme výhradním dovozcem tepelných čerpadel NIBE vyráběných naší mateřskou společností pro Českou a Slovenskou republiku. Novinkou od roku 2...

Rencol Components Ltd.
Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE







Rencol Components Ltd.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2026.
Incident History - DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DZ Dražice, člen skupiny NIBE

Rencol Components Ltd.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.