Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Düsseldorf AirportDüsseldorf Airport
VS
EmiratesEmirates
Düsseldorf Airport

Düsseldorf Airport

Flughafenstrasse 105, Düsseldorf, 40474, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.dus.com/de-de/impressum
751/1000Fair

Der Düsseldorfer Airport ist der größte Flughafen Nordrhein-Westfalens. In einer der wirtschaftlich stärksten Regionen Europas mit 18 Millionen Einwohnern in einem Umkreis von 100 Kilometern gelegen, konzentriert sich hier der Luftverkehr der Rhein-Ruhr-Region. Zwar i...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:483
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Emirates

Emirates

Dubai, Dubai, 686, AE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.emirates.com
826/1000Good

Based in Dubai, the Emirates Group employs over 120,000 staff from more than 170 nationalities. The Emirates Group’s extensive and diverse international portfolio includes the world’s largest international airline, Emirates, and one of the largest combined air services ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:68,772
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Düsseldorf Airport

Düsseldorf Airport

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Emirates

Emirates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Düsseldorf Airport in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emirates in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Düsseldorf Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Düsseldorf Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Emirates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emirates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Düsseldorf Airport

Düsseldorf Airport

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DSS3337823
Emirates

Emirates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport company and Emirates company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport and Emirates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport and Emirates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Düsseldorf Airport or Emirates ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Düsseldorf Airport or Emirates ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport and Emirates, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Düsseldorf Airport and Emirates, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1