Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DuckDuckGoDuckDuckGo
VS
CiscoCisco
DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo

Paoli, US

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://duckduckgo.com/
736/1000Moderate

At DuckDuckGo, we believe the best way to protect your personal information from hackers, scammers, and privacy-invasive companies is to stop it from being collected at all. That's why millions of people choose DuckDuckGo over Chrome and other browsers to search and bro...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:453
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
156/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
33
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

DuckDuckGo has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 3073.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DuckDuckGo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DuckDuckGo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DUCHARGHO1779798590
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DUC1772461435
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADO1788668623
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1787228649
🔒 Incident : Breach
CISRESMICAMASERSALGIT1786868753

FAQ

Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DuckDuckGo company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DuckDuckGo and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DuckDuckGo and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DuckDuckGo or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DuckDuckGo or Cisco ?
Between DuckDuckGo and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DuckDuckGo and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8