Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

dudu
VS
HuaweiHuawei
du

du

EMAAR Business Park - Dubai Hills Estate, Dubai , 502666, AE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.du.ae
692/1000Weak

Add life to life. Welcome to a vibrant and multiple award-winning telecommunications service provider. Our aim is to bring people and businesses together in what we do best, by offering mobile and fixed services, broadband connectivity and IPTV services to people, home...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:7,059
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Huawei

Huawei

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518129, CN

Last Update: 18/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.huawei.com/en/
796/1000Fair

Huawei is a leading global provider of information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. With integrated solutions across four key domains – telecom networks, IT, smart devices, and cloud services – we are committed to bringing digital to...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:134,994
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
du

du

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Huawei

Huawei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for du in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Huawei has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - du (X = Date, Y = Severity)

du cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Huawei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Huawei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
du

du

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DU1182011112325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DU3432434102225
Huawei

Huawei

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PALHUAAMEMIC1781613039
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
UNIHUAAME1781792980
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUA1993019100625

FAQ

Between du company and Huawei company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between du company and Huawei company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between du and Huawei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between du and Huawei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - du or Huawei ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - du or Huawei ?
Between du and Huawei, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between du and Huawei, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA