Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DTU ElectroDTU Electro
VS
Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos National Laboratory
DTU Electro

DTU Electro

Ørsteds Plads 343, Kgs. Lyngby, DK, 2800

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.electro.dtu.dk
664/1000Weak

Light and electronics - photons and electrons - are the key bits of tomorrows sustainable society. Where they meet, change is made. At DTU Electro, we combine the immense possibilities of electrical and photonics engineering. Our research is, among other things, used i...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:200
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, US, 87545

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lanl.gov/
776/1000Fair

Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes ...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:13,101
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DTU Electro

DTU Electro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

DTU Electro has 23.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Alamos National Laboratory in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DTU Electro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DTU Electro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Los Alamos National Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Alamos National Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DTU Electro

DTU Electro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DTU1791102334
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DTU Electro company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DTU Electro and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DTU Electro and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DTU Electro or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DTU Electro or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Between DTU Electro and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DTU Electro and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9