Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni GroupDTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group
VS
GlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

Block 19 #05-153, , Singapore , 339410, SG

Last Update: 24/02/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

DTDS is a leading distribution company for Electronic Components. Incorporated in 2001 and headquartered in Singapore, it has a full-fledged office with sales, marketing, operations and finance team to support channel partners in fulfilling their customer orders.

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GlobalFoundries

GlobalFoundries

400 Stone Break Road Extension, Malta, 12020, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gf.com/
799/1000Fair

GlobalFoundries (GF) is one of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers. GF is redefining innovation and semiconductor manufacturing by developing and delivering feature-rich process technology solutions that provide leadership performance in pervasive high growt...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:13,706
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GlobalFoundries

GlobalFoundries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GlobalFoundries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GlobalFoundries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GlobalFoundries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GlobalFoundries

GlobalFoundries

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group company and GlobalFoundries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group and GlobalFoundries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group and GlobalFoundries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group or GlobalFoundries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group or GlobalFoundries ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group and GlobalFoundries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DTDS Technology Pte Ltd., Marubeni Group and GlobalFoundries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86098
SUMMARY

ntop nDPI versions before 6.0 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the ndpi_json_string_escape function that writes beyond caller-supplied buffer boundaries. Attackers can trigger the overflow by supplying crafted network packet data including TLS SNI, HTTP headers, or DNS names that reach the vulnerable function, causing heap corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-86097
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in param_set_default_file() and param_set_backup_file() functions that allows attackers to crash the autopilot process. Attackers can invoke 'param select' or 'param select-backup' commands with no path argument from any PX4 shell to trigger the crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86096
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in TemperatureCalibration::start() due to a race condition between task spawning and object deletion. Attackers can trigger the calibration process via shell commands to write to freed heap memory, corrupting unrelated objects or allocator metadata and destabilizing heap operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86095
SUMMARY

Unidata netcdf-c through 4.10.1 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in NC4_HDF5_inq_attname() that copies HDF5 attribute names into a fixed 256-byte buffer without length validation. Attackers can craft HDF5 files with oversized attribute names to overflow the destination buffer, causing memory corruption and crashes when applications enumerate attribute names.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-48019
SUMMARY

Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0, a CRLF injection vulnerability in Laravel's email validation, in combination with how Symfony Mailer and Symfony Mime handle certain character sequences, may allow an unauthenticated attacker to interfere with outbound email processing in applications that send mail to user-supplied addresses. This issue has been patched in versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2