Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DstlDstl
VS
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) CareersNaval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
Dstl

Dstl

Dstl Headquarters, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, GB

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gov.uk/dstl
756/1000Fair

The Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory brings together the top minds across government, academia and industry to keep the armed forces and the country safe. Our pioneering work covers areas including cyber, quantum, AI, space, autonomy, robotics, weapons and ge...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:1,834
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

N/A

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

We are NAVSEA. The Force Behind the Fleet. Join us and become part of a mission-driven team, at one of the best places to work in the federal government. This NAVSEA LinkedIn page is all about connecting with talented individuals ready to make a difference through a rew...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:20,019
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dstl

Dstl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dstl in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dstl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dstl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dstl

Dstl

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dstl company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dstl and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dstl and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dstl or Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dstl or Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers ?
Between Dstl and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dstl and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9