Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

dsm-firmenich Beauty & Caredsm-firmenich Beauty & Care
VS
KenvueKenvue
dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

Wurmisweg 576, Kaiseraugst, CH-4303 , CH

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile

Beauty & Care: A House of Science beyond Wellbeing. Our Beauty & Care solutions bring beauty and health to the forefront of daily life. Looking after our face, skin, and hair is essential to our sense of self-confidence and holistic beauty. Our remarkably sustainable ...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kenvue

Kenvue

Summit, New Jersey, US, 07901

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.kenvue.com
806/1000Good

Kenvue is the world’s largest pure-play consumer health company by revenue. Built on more than a century of heritage and propelled forward by science, our iconic brands — including Aveeno®, BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages, Johnson’s®, Listerine®, Neutrogena®, Tylenol®...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:19,168
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kenvue

Kenvue

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenvue in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kenvue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenvue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kenvue

Kenvue

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care company and Kenvue company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care and Kenvue, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care and Kenvue, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care or Kenvue ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care or Kenvue ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care and Kenvue, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between dsm-firmenich Beauty & Care and Kenvue, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2