Comparison Overview

DS Smith

VS

Steel Authority of India Limited

DS Smith

1 Paddington Square, LONDON, W2 1DL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

DS Smith provides innovative packaging solutions, paper products and recycling services with a commitment to sustainability and a circular economy. Our core purpose is to Redefine Packaging for a Changing World, and our expert teams work closely with like-minded partners to incorporate renewable resources for products that minimize our environmental impact, reduce complexity and increase profitability through supply chain optimization.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,059
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Steel Authority of India Limited

IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) traces its origin to the formative years of an emerging nation - India. After independence, the steel sector was to propel the economic growth and rapid industrialization of the country, and since 1973, SAIL steel has played a pivotal role in transforming the nation. SAIL is the largest steel-making company in India and one of the seven Maharatna’s of the country’s Central Public Sector Enterprises. We produce top quality steel and iron at five integrated plants and three special steel plants, located principally in the eastern and central regions of India and situated close to domestic sources of raw materials. We manufacture and sell a broad range of steel products which are high in demand in the domestic as well as international market. Visit this page regularly to stay connected and get updates about our products, new initiatives, accomplishments, and more.. Follow us at X: www.x.com/SAILSteel and www.instgram.com/steelauthority

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,694
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ds-smith.jpeg
DS Smith
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steel-authority-of-india-limited.jpeg
Steel Authority of India Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DS Smith
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Steel Authority of India Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DS Smith in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steel Authority of India Limited in 2025.

Incident History — DS Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DS Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Steel Authority of India Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steel Authority of India Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ds-smith.jpeg
DS Smith
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steel-authority-of-india-limited.jpeg
Steel Authority of India Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DS Smith company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Steel Authority of India Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Steel Authority of India Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DS Smith company.

In the current year, Steel Authority of India Limited company and DS Smith company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor DS Smith company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor DS Smith company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Steel Authority of India Limited company nor DS Smith company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DS Smith company nor Steel Authority of India Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DS Smith company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Steel Authority of India Limited company.

Steel Authority of India Limited company employs more people globally than DS Smith company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DS Smith nor Steel Authority of India Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N