Comparison Overview

Drury Southwest, Inc.

VS

Colliers

Drury Southwest, Inc.

101 S. Farrar Drive, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, US, 63701
Last Update: 2025-12-10

We are a family-owned business focused on development and operation of real estate, restaurants, and convenience stores primarily in the Cape Girardeau and San Antonio markets but also in many cities across the country. Nationally, we also develop and construct hotels in several states. Founded on the principles of strong work ethic and an honest approach to growth, we strive to provide our customers with expertise, quality, and service and a top-notch product.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Colliers

Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Colliers (NASDAQ, TSX: CIGI) is a leading diversified professional services and investment management company. With operations in 68 countries, our 19,000 enterprising professionals work collaboratively to provide expert real estate and investment advice to clients. For more than 29 years, our experienced leadership with significant inside ownership has delivered compound annual investment returns of approximately 20% for shareholders. With annual revenues of $4.3 billion and $96 billion of assets under management, Colliers maximizes the potential of property and real assets to accelerate the success of our clients, our investors and our people. Learn more at corporate.colliers.com, X @Colliers or LinkedIn.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25,427
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drury-southwest-inc.jpeg
Drury Southwest, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colliers.jpeg
Colliers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Drury Southwest, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colliers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

Drury Southwest, Inc. has 40.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colliers in 2025.

Incident History — Drury Southwest, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drury Southwest, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colliers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colliers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drury-southwest-inc.jpeg
Drury Southwest, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colliers.jpeg
Colliers
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Colliers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drury Southwest, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Drury Southwest, Inc. and Colliers have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Drury Southwest, Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than Colliers company.

Colliers company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Drury Southwest, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Drury Southwest, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Colliers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Colliers company nor Drury Southwest, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. company nor Colliers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Colliers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Drury Southwest, Inc. company.

Colliers company employs more people globally than Drury Southwest, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Drury Southwest, Inc. nor Colliers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X