Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.
VS
Cincinnati Children'sCincinnati Children's
Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

6101 Ball Rd, Cypress, 90630, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.drsi360.com
723/1000Moderate

DRSI is a leading provider of patient-centered and client-focused revenue cycle services. We help our clients improve their patient communication and satisfaction, their reputation within the community they represent, and their financial performance. Services include 'D...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Cincinnati Children’s, a nonprofit academic medical center established in 1883, offers services from well-child care to treatment for the most rare and complex conditions. It is the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and trains ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,334
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cincinnati Children's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DRS423072525
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. or Cincinnati Children's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. or Cincinnati Children's ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85456
SUMMARY

MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-85455
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85454
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-85453
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-85452
SUMMARY

MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8