Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Drakontas LLCDrakontas LLC
VS
DNVDNV
Drakontas LLC

Drakontas LLC

1777 Sentry Parkway West, Bluebell, 19422, US

Last Update: 19/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.drakontas.com
100/1000Critical

Drakontas is a leading provider of collaboration software solutions and training programs to Federal, state, and local governments, serving the defense, law enforcement, criminal justice, and transportation communities. Our core product is called DragonForce, a comman...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
DNV

DNV

Veritasveien 1, Høvik, Oslo, NO, 1322

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.dnv.com
748/1000Moderate

DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100 countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions. Whether...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:22,475
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Drakontas LLC

Drakontas LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DNV

DNV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Drakontas LLC has 281.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DNV in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Drakontas LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drakontas LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DNV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DNV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Drakontas LLC

Drakontas LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DRAPRO1787127993
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PLUUNIDRA1774009537
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DRAUNISHA1779027889
DNV

DNV

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DNV905092125

FAQ

Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Drakontas LLC company and DNV company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Drakontas LLC and DNV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Drakontas LLC and DNV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Drakontas LLC or DNV ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Drakontas LLC or DNV ?
Between Drakontas LLC and DNV, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Drakontas LLC and DNV, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA