Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dragos, Inc.Dragos, Inc.
VS
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONSNETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Dragos, Inc.

Dragos, Inc.

1745 Dorsey Road, Suite S, Hanover, Maryland, US, 21076

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dragos.com
666/1000Weak

Dragos provides the most effective OT cybersecurity technology for industrial and critical infrastructure to deliver on our global mission: to safeguard civilization. After nearly a decade of real-world experience handling landmark attacks on OT networks, Dragos underst...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:583
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.n-security.com
767/1000Fair

## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. O...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,471
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dragos, Inc.

Dragos, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dragos, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dragos, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dragos, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dragos, Inc.

Dragos, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DRA1768614514
🔒 Incident : Breach
DRA1783513998
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dragos, Inc. company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dragos, Inc. and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dragos, Inc. and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dragos, Inc. or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dragos, Inc. or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Between Dragos, Inc. and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dragos, Inc. and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1