Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dragontail SystemsDragontail Systems
VS
SwiggySwiggy
Dragontail Systems

Dragontail Systems

673 Bourke Street, Melbourne, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Dragontail Systems is a global leading B2B company, that provides a revolutionary software solution to optimize and streamline the food preparation and dispatch, mainly to the QSR (Quick Service Restaurant) industry. We are proud to be part of Yum! Brands, a company w...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Swiggy

Swiggy

Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.swiggy.com
791/1000Fair

Swiggy is India’s pioneering on-demand convenience platform, catering to millions of consumers each month. Founded in 2014, its mission is to elevate the quality of life for the urban consumer by offering unparalleled convenience. With an extensive footprint in food del...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:26,451
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dragontail Systems

Dragontail Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swiggy

Swiggy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dragontail Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiggy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dragontail Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dragontail Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swiggy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiggy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dragontail Systems

Dragontail Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Swiggy

Swiggy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dragontail Systems company and Swiggy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dragontail Systems and Swiggy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dragontail Systems and Swiggy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dragontail Systems or Swiggy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dragontail Systems or Swiggy ?
Between Dragontail Systems and Swiggy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dragontail Systems and Swiggy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3