Comparison Overview
Dragontail Systems
Dragontail Systems
673 Bourke Street, Melbourne, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 08/03/2026
Dragontail Systems is a global leading B2B company, that provides a revolutionary software solution to optimize and streamline the food preparation and dispatch, mainly to the QSR (Quick Service Restaurant) industry. We are proud to be part of Yum! Brands, a company w...
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, 06854, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) is the world leader in online travel and services that support the entire travel journey. Our platforms - including Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, KAYAK and OpenTable - utilize advanced AI, machine learning and other innovative technologi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Dragontail Systems
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dragontail Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Dragontail Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dragontail Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Dragontail Systems
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.