Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dragonfly Asset ManagementDragonfly Asset Management
VS
M&T BankM&T Bank
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

London, GB

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
684/1000Weak

Dragonfly Asset Management identifies the leading digital assets. Our experienced multi-disciplinary team blends decades of traditional investment experience with tech-native blockchain expertise to identify compelling infrastructure investment opportunities in the digi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

345 Main St., Buffalo, 14203, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.mtb.com
669/1000Weak

Great companies have an enduring sense of purpose. At M&T, our purpose is a simple one: make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. Founded in 1856 in Buffalo, NY we are now a top 11 full-service US-based commercial bank with a retail footpr...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:30,274
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Dragonfly Asset Management has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

M&T Bank has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Dragonfly Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dragonfly Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - M&T Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&T Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DRA1776205993
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TTHI1776869694
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TLAW1776869766

FAQ

Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and M&T Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and M&T Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and M&T Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dragonfly Asset Management or M&T Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dragonfly Asset Management or M&T Bank ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and M&T Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and M&T Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-50044
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44955
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42933
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-40430
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-28698
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9