Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dragonfly Asset ManagementDragonfly Asset Management
VS
KPMG USKPMG US
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

London, GB

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
684/1000Weak

Dragonfly Asset Management identifies the leading digital assets. Our experienced multi-disciplinary team blends decades of traditional investment experience with tech-native blockchain expertise to identify compelling infrastructure investment opportunities in the digi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
KPMG US

KPMG US

345 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10154

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com/US
816/1000Good

KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 90+ offices and more than 36,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:53,626
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPMG US

KPMG US

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Dragonfly Asset Management has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG US in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dragonfly Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dragonfly Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPMG US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dragonfly Asset Management

Dragonfly Asset Management

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DRA1776205993
KPMG US

KPMG US

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management company and KPMG US company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and KPMG US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and KPMG US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dragonfly Asset Management or KPMG US ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dragonfly Asset Management or KPMG US ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and KPMG US, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dragonfly Asset Management and KPMG US, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8