Comparison Overview
DragonEx Network

DragonEx Network
1550 New Petchburi Road, Makkasan, Ratthawi, Bangkok, 10440, TH
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Launched on 2 November 2017 in Singapore, DragonEx is a cryptocurrency exchange with an accumulative transaction volume of $25.5 billion. DragonEx is the pioneer of the transaction mining model, and 100% of trading commission income is promised to share with DT holders....

UBS
Postbox, Zurich, CH, 8001
Last Update: 27/07/2026
From gaining new experiences in different roles to acquiring fresh knowledge and skills – at UBS we believe that you should never stop growing and learning because life never stops teaching. We know that it's our people – with their unique backgrounds, skills, experienc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DragonEx Network







UBS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DragonEx Network in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UBS in 2026.
Incident History - DragonEx Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DragonEx Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DragonEx Network

UBS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.