Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DragonEx NetworkDragonEx Network
VS
Shriram Finance LimitedShriram Finance Limited
DragonEx Network

DragonEx Network

1550 New Petchburi Road, Makkasan, Ratthawi, Bangkok, 10440, TH

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://dragonex.io/
739/1000Moderate

Launched on 2 November 2017 in Singapore, DragonEx is a cryptocurrency exchange with an accumulative transaction volume of $25.5 billion. DragonEx is the pioneer of the transaction mining model, and 100% of trading commission income is promised to share with DT holders....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

Wockhardt Towers, Level-3, West Wing, C-2, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai, IN, 400051

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
793/1000Fair

Shriram Finance is the country’s biggest retail NBFC offering credit solutions for commercial vehicles, two-wheeler loans, car loans, home loans, gold loans, personal and small business loans. We are part of the 50-year-old Shriram Group, a financial conglomerate that h...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:34,477
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DragonEx Network

DragonEx Network

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DragonEx Network in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shriram Finance Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DragonEx Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DragonEx Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shriram Finance Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shriram Finance Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DragonEx Network

DragonEx Network

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DRA20255123
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DragonEx Network company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DragonEx Network and Shriram Finance Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DragonEx Network and Shriram Finance Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DragonEx Network or Shriram Finance Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DragonEx Network or Shriram Finance Limited ?
Between DragonEx Network and Shriram Finance Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DragonEx Network and Shriram Finance Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA