Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dow Packaging & Specialty PlasticsDow Packaging & Specialty Plastics
VS
Berry Global, Inc.Berry Global, Inc.
Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

2211 H.H. Dow Way, Midland, 48674, US

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dow.com
738/1000Moderate

We’re passionate about the value of plastic. Always looking for new ideas to improve the way we use it and reuse it. Partnering with others who share our passion to make products that are innovative and sustainable. While working to keep plastic out of the environment. ...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

101 Oakley Street, Evansville, IN, US, 47710

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.berryglobal.com
767/1000Fair

Berry Global, Inc. has merged with Amcor as of April 30, 2025. As a global leader in packaging solutions for consumer and healthcare products, our industry-leading innovation capabilities, global scale and technical expertise help our customers grow and meet the needs...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berry Global, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Berry Global, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berry Global, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dow Packaging & Specialty Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8