Comparison Overview
Douglas Elliman Real Estate

Douglas Elliman Real Estate
575 Madison Avenue, None, New York, NY, US, 10022
Last Update: 15/02/2026
Douglas Elliman Inc. (NYSE: DOUG, “Douglas Elliman”) owns Douglas Elliman Realty, LLC, which is one of the largest residential brokerage companies in the United States with operations in New York, Florida, California, Texas, Colorado, Nevada, Massachusetts, Connecticut,...

Coldwell Banker Realty
175 Park Avenue, Madison, NJ, US, 07940
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Coldwell Banker Realty is one of the nation’s largest real estate brokerages operating in 50 markets in the United States. Powered by a network of approximately 55,000 independent real estate agents and 600 offices, Coldwell Banker Realty, a subsidiary of Anywhere Real ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Douglas Elliman Real Estate







Coldwell Banker Realty






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Douglas Elliman Real Estate in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coldwell Banker Realty in 2026.
Incident History - Douglas Elliman Real Estate (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Douglas Elliman Real Estate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coldwell Banker Realty (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coldwell Banker Realty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Douglas Elliman Real Estate

Coldwell Banker Realty
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.