Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DoubleTree by HiltonDoubleTree by Hilton
VS
Wyndham Hotels & ResortsWyndham Hotels & Resorts
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doubletree.com
797/1000Fair

DoubleTree by Hilton hotels are distinctively designed properties that provide true comfort to today’s business and leisure travelers. From the millions of delighted hotel guests who are welcomed with the brand’s legendary, warm chocolate chip cookies at check-in to the...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:15,542
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

22 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, 07054, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

We are Wyndham Hotels & Resorts. We are the world’s largest hotel franchising company by the number of franchised properties, with approximately 8,300 hotels across approximately 100 countries on six continents. We operate a portfolio of 25 hotel brands: Whether choosi...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:10,254
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoubleTree by Hilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DoubleTree by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoubleTree by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton company and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DoubleTree by Hilton or Wyndham Hotels & Resorts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DoubleTree by Hilton or Wyndham Hotels & Resorts ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DoubleTree by Hilton and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA