Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Double ConsultingDouble Consulting
VS
Stefanini BrasilStefanini Brasil
Double Consulting

Double Consulting

Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, Roma, 00147, IT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Double Consulting è un'azienda italiana attiva nella consulenza direzionale. Nata nel giugno 2005 dall’iniziativa di alcuni professionisti provenienti da aziende multinazionali leader nel mondo della consulenza, lavora a fianco dei suoi clienti aiutandoli a gestire il c...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:122
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

Avenida Eusébio Matoso 1375, São Paulo, 05423-905, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stefanini.com.br
790/1000Fair

Global Tech Consulting Company All in One. Stefanini is a Brazilian multinational company with 37 years of experience and presence in 41 countries. With more than 38,000 employees, we co-create solutions for a better future, driving digital transformation with a focu...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:12,159
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Double Consulting

Double Consulting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Double Consulting in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stefanini Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Double Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Double Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stefanini Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stefanini Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Double Consulting

Double Consulting

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stefanini Brasil

Stefanini Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Double Consulting company and Stefanini Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Double Consulting and Stefanini Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Double Consulting and Stefanini Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Double Consulting or Stefanini Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Double Consulting or Stefanini Brasil ?
Between Double Consulting and Stefanini Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Double Consulting and Stefanini Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8