Comparison Overview
Dominion Voting Systems

Dominion Voting Systems
Denver, 80202, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
We are a full service organization that understands how critical it is for you to have a solutions provider committed to being transparent: transparent in how they do business, in how their products work and in how they operate within your election process. We are much ...

Birlasoft
35 & 36, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 09/09/2026
Navigating Change. Powering Progress. | Reimagining the Future with Birlasoft Birlasoft, a powerhouse where domain expertise, enterprise solutions, and digital technologies converge to redefine business processes. We take pride in our consultative and design thinking ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Dominion Voting Systems







Birlasoft






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dominion Voting Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Birlasoft in 2026.
Incident History - Dominion Voting Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dominion Voting Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Birlasoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Birlasoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Dominion Voting Systems

Birlasoft
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.