Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

domainfactory GmbHdomainfactory GmbH
VS
T-Systems InternationalT-Systems International
domainfactory GmbH

domainfactory GmbH

Neuturmstraße 5, Munich, 80331, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.df.eu/
733/1000Moderate

domainfactory GmbH is an Information Technology and Services company located in Neuturmstrasse 5, 80331 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Hahnstraße 43d, Frankfurt am Main, DE, 60528

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.t-systems.com
775/1000Fair

Your digitalization partner with industry expertise With locations in more than 26 countries and over 26,000 employees (2024), T-Systems is one of the leading providers of digital services in Europe. The Deutsche Telekom subsidiary is headquartered in Germany and has a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,998
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
domainfactory GmbH

domainfactory GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for domainfactory GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - domainfactory GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

domainfactory GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - T-Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
domainfactory GmbH

domainfactory GmbH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
DOM2147101122
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
DOM1633311223
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between domainfactory GmbH company and T-Systems International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between domainfactory GmbH and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between domainfactory GmbH and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - domainfactory GmbH or T-Systems International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - domainfactory GmbH or T-Systems International ?
Between domainfactory GmbH and T-Systems International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between domainfactory GmbH and T-Systems International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8