Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dolly by TaskrabbitDolly by Taskrabbit
VS
STEFSTEF
Dolly by Taskrabbit

Dolly by Taskrabbit

901 5th Ave, Seattle, 98104, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://dolly.com
719/1000Moderate

Dolly is the big & bulky, last-mile delivery partner that will delight your customers. Trusted by retailers like The Container Store, Lowe’s, Costco, Crate & Barrel, Big Lots!, and many more. We’ve built a national point-to-point delivery network with 15,000+ drivers (H...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:133
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
STEF

STEF

93 Boulevard Malesherbes, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stef.com
755/1000Fair

STEF group is the European leader for temperature controlled logistics and transport. Our 22,000 employees in 8 countries are dedicated to serve everyday agrifood, distribution, foodservice and seafood players with the highest standards of security, rapidity and quality...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:12,305
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dolly by Taskrabbit

Dolly by Taskrabbit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
STEF

STEF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dolly by Taskrabbit in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STEF in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dolly by Taskrabbit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dolly by Taskrabbit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - STEF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STEF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dolly by Taskrabbit

Dolly by Taskrabbit

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOL547091725
STEF

STEF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit company and STEF company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit and STEF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit and STEF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dolly by Taskrabbit or STEF ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dolly by Taskrabbit or STEF ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit and STEF, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dolly by Taskrabbit and STEF, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2