Comparison Overview
Dollar Tree Stores
Dollar Tree Stores
500 Volvo Pkwy, Chesapeake, 23320, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dollar Tree remains committed to our original mission: giving our customers extreme value at low prices. Employing more than 150,000 associates across a network of 9,000 stores and 18 distribution centers in North America, we’re fulfilling that mission more now than eve...
Ahold Delhaize
Ahold, 1506 MA Zaandam, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Ahold Delhaize is one of the world’s largest food retail groups, we are a leader in supermarkets and e-commerce, and a company at the forefront of sustainable retailing. Our local brands employ around 393,000 associates in around 9,400 local grocery, small format, and s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Dollar Tree Stores
Ahold Delhaize
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dollar Tree Stores in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ahold Delhaize in 2026.
Incident History - Dollar Tree Stores (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dollar Tree Stores cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ahold Delhaize (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ahold Delhaize cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Dollar Tree Stores
Ahold Delhaize
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.