Comparison Overview
Dolby Laboratories
Dolby Laboratories
1275 Market St, San Francisco, California, US, 94103
Last Update: 29/04/2026
We're the rain on the roof in a movie. The music flowing through your earbuds when you're at the gym. The footsteps lurking behind you in a video game. The voice of a colleague on a call who seems to be right next to you. The sight of a breathtakingly bright and vivid s...
HARMAN International
400 Atlantic St, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06901
Last Update: 23/09/2026
Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Dolby Laboratories
HARMAN International
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Dolby Laboratories has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.
Incident History - Dolby Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dolby Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Dolby Laboratories
HARMAN International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.