Comparison Overview
Dolby Laboratories

Dolby Laboratories
1275 Market St, San Francisco, California, US, 94103
Last Update: 29/04/2026
We're the rain on the roof in a movie. The music flowing through your earbuds when you're at the gym. The footsteps lurking behind you in a video game. The voice of a colleague on a call who seems to be right next to you. The sight of a breathtakingly bright and vivid s...

Canon USA
One Canon Park, Melville, NY, US, 11747
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Living and Working Together For The Common Good... - Kyosei Kyosei unites Canon and its employees in contributing to the prosperity of humanity and the protection of the world we share. As a leading provider of consumer, business-to-business, and industrial digital ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Dolby Laboratories







Canon USA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Dolby Laboratories has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Canon USA in 2026.
Incident History - Dolby Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dolby Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Canon USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Canon USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Dolby Laboratories

Canon USA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.