Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Business with ESABusiness with ESA
VS
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Business with ESA

Business with ESA

Paris, FR

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

ESA invites space and non-space companies, from start-ups to large system integrators, to get involved in its space activities.

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

300 E Street SW, Washington, 20546, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nasa.gov
806/1000Good

For more than 60 years, NASA has been breaking barriers to achieve the seemingly impossible—from walking on the Moon to pushing the boundaries of human spaceflight farther than ever before. We work in space and around the world in laboratories and wind tunnels, on airfi...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:51,851
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Business with ESA

Business with ESA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business with ESA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Business with ESA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business with ESA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Business with ESA

Business with ESA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAS449061725
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NAS829052725
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NAS214223222

FAQ

Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Business with ESA company and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Business with ESA and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Business with ESA and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Business with ESA or NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Business with ESA or NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration ?
Between Business with ESA and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Business with ESA and NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8