Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Doğuş EnerjiDoğuş Enerji
VS
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
Doğuş Enerji

Doğuş Enerji

N/A

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dogusenerji.com
743/1000Moderate

2005 yılında Doğuş Grubu bünyesinde çalışmalarına başlayan Doğuş Enerji, enerji sektöründe hem Türkiye'de hem de dünyada yaşanan tüm gelişmeleri takip etmeyi amaç edinmiştir. Enerji yatırımı ve elektrik üretimi faaliyetlerinin ardından 2012 yılında elektrik ticareti faa...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Avenida. Libertador con calle El Empalme , Caracas, 1050, VE

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.pdvsa.com
645/1000Poor

Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. is a Venezuelan state company, began operations on January 1st, 1976 and whose activities are the oil exploration, production, refining, marketing and transportation of Venezuelan oil as well as the orimulsion, chemical, petrochemical busines...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:25,708
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Doğuş Enerji

Doğuş Enerji

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doğuş Enerji in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Doğuş Enerji (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doğuş Enerji cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Doğuş Enerji

Doğuş Enerji

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1776853705
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1768583981
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1765893364

FAQ

Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Doğuş Enerji company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Doğuş Enerji and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Doğuş Enerji and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Doğuş Enerji or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Doğuş Enerji or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Between Doğuş Enerji and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Doğuş Enerji and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2