Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dodd GroupDodd Group
VS
VINCIVINCI
Dodd Group

Dodd Group

Stafford Park 13, Telford, TF3 3AZ, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.doddgroup.com
624/1000Poor

Dodd Group was formed in 1947 in Shropshire and has remained a privately owned family business. With an unrivaled reputation within the building services sector we offer a comprehensive electrical and mechanical design and installation as well as property maintenance se...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:605
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
VINCI

VINCI

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vinci.com
816/1000Good

VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in more than 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-roun...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:13,939
Subsidiaries:134
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dodd Group

Dodd Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VINCI

VINCI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dodd Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dodd Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dodd Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dodd Group

Dodd Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DOD0603306102125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DOD3603336102125
VINCI

VINCI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dodd Group company and VINCI company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dodd Group and VINCI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dodd Group and VINCI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dodd Group or VINCI ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dodd Group or VINCI ?
Between Dodd Group and VINCI, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dodd Group and VINCI, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA