Comparison Overview
Dodd Group

Dodd Group
Stafford Park 13, Telford, TF3 3AZ, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dodd Group was formed in 1947 in Shropshire and has remained a privately owned family business. With an unrivaled reputation within the building services sector we offer a comprehensive electrical and mechanical design and installation as well as property maintenance se...

VINCI
1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in more than 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-roun...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Dodd Group







VINCI






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dodd Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2026.
Incident History - Dodd Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dodd Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Dodd Group

VINCI
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.