Comparison Overview
dnata Travel Group

dnata Travel Group
dnata Travel Centre, Business Bay, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 05/03/2026
At the dnata Travel Group, we represent the travel division of dnata, one of the world’s largest air and travel services providers. Part of The Emirates Group, our history is rooted in Dubai and the growth of its pioneering travel industry, evolving to consist of more t...

Costa Crociere S.p.A.
Piazza Piccapietra 48, Genova, IT, 16121
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Costa belongs to the Carnival Corporation & plc Group, listed on the London and New York stock exchanges, the largest cruise company in the world. Costa, the only Italian cruise company flying the Italian flag, has been sailing the world’s seas for more than 75 years,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

dnata Travel Group







Costa Crociere S.p.A.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for dnata Travel Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Costa Crociere S.p.A. in 2026.
Incident History - dnata Travel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
dnata Travel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Costa Crociere S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Costa Crociere S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

dnata Travel Group

Costa Crociere S.p.A.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.