Comparison Overview
DNA Communications

DNA Communications
601 First Ave, Rochelle, IL, US, 61068
Last Update: 29/06/2026
We’re going on 21 great years of service, dedicated to serving North-Central Illinois rural communities, with the highest quality Digital Telecommunication Services, Fiber Optics, DSL, ADSL, VDSL, SIP Trunking, without the high costs. Our Headquarters is in Rochelle Ill...

TIM
Via Gaetano Negri, 1, Milano, 20123, IT
Last Update: 30/03/2026
We are driving the digital transition of Italy and Brazil with innovative technologies and services because we want to contribute to accelerating the sustainable growth of the economy and society by bringing value and prosperity to people, companies and institutions. W...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DNA Communications







TIM






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
DNA Communications has 48.98% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TIM in 2026.
Incident History - DNA Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DNA Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DNA Communications

TIM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.